Interactive demonstration · fictional data
See what should happen to an asset before deciding to replace it
Bright Decisions enriches survey data to compare the financial, carbon and waste implications of retaining, repairing, remanufacturing or replacing building assets.
No login. No production data. Approximately four minutes per scenario.
Whole-life cost
£608k avoided
Example portfolio programme
Embodied carbon
338 tCO₂e avoided
Against replace-all baseline
Waste diverted
16.5 tonnes
91% material recovery
Evidence
Fully auditable
Source and confidence on every field
Who Bright Decisions is built for
One record, read differently by each party to the asset's life. Choose your role to start the most relevant walkthrough.
A decision-intelligence tool
Bright Decisions exists to answer one question well: what should happen to this asset? Asset registers, maintenance records, dynamic warranties and digital waste records all support that decision and keep the evidence alive afterwards — but the decision comes first.
Enriched survey data
Incomplete survey records are enriched against product data, EPDs and duty-cycle models — every value confidence-flagged and held for human verification.
Four options, one comparison
Retain, repair, remanufacture and replace, measured in cost, carbon and waste.
Evidence you can defend
Every value carries a source, a confidence level and a reviewer.
A repeatable method
A new luminaire's measured EPD and existing stock's modelled TM65 figure are not directly comparable ad hoc. The same enrichment and verification pipeline puts them on one basis, every time. Every verified decision feeds back into that pipeline, so it gets sharper over time — grounded in real commercial and remanufacture outcomes, not fixed assumptions.
Browse by workflow
Prefer to browse by workflow instead? Six guided walkthroughs, numbered end to end.
Not ready to talk yet?
Take the example decision report away and share it with your team.