BrightDecisions

Interactive demonstration · fictional data

See what should happen to an asset before deciding to replace it

Bright Decisions enriches survey data to compare the financial, carbon and waste implications of retaining, repairing, remanufacturing or replacing building assets.

No login. No production data. Approximately four minutes per scenario.

Whole-life cost

£608k avoided

Example portfolio programme

Embodied carbon

338 tCO₂e avoided

Against replace-all baseline

Waste diverted

16.5 tonnes

91% material recovery

Evidence

Fully auditable

Source and confidence on every field

Who Bright Decisions is built for

One record, read differently by each party to the asset's life. Choose your role to start the most relevant walkthrough.

A decision-intelligence tool

Bright Decisions exists to answer one question well: what should happen to this asset? Asset registers, maintenance records, dynamic warranties and digital waste records all support that decision and keep the evidence alive afterwards — but the decision comes first.

Enriched survey data

Incomplete survey records are enriched against product data, EPDs and duty-cycle models — every value confidence-flagged and held for human verification.

Four options, one comparison

Retain, repair, remanufacture and replace, measured in cost, carbon and waste.

Evidence you can defend

Every value carries a source, a confidence level and a reviewer.

A repeatable method

A new luminaire's measured EPD and existing stock's modelled TM65 figure are not directly comparable ad hoc. The same enrichment and verification pipeline puts them on one basis, every time. Every verified decision feeds back into that pipeline, so it gets sharper over time — grounded in real commercial and remanufacture outcomes, not fixed assumptions.

Browse by workflow

Prefer to browse by workflow instead? Six guided walkthroughs, numbered end to end.

Not ready to talk yet?

Take the example decision report away and share it with your team.